These traditions have been passed on from generation to generation. This limits the range and variety of inquiry and expression on which our culture depends. America was founded on the thought of being able to make our own ideas and options for our lives.
People can kill with a car or a baseball bat, but no one is trying to ban you from driving to the ballgame. Not so simple, is it? Banned Books Week celebrates readers everywhere and encourages us to pick up a book whose content has, at some point, been questioned.
The complaints of the challengers were long and varied, but mostly came down to violence: In its year history alone, over 11, books have been challenged.
Books teach us history in context. Gun ownership also made it possible to create local militias to protect our country and to keep other countries from invading.
Banning books divulges more about the censor than the book or the author brought into the limelight. They are also a symbol of protection for the home, fighting for liberation and family tradition.
The Romans, otherwise liberal, did it. Is it acceptable to allow revisionists to publish their arguments? I think most people can think of a book they wish they could ban from libraries, bookstores, or schools. The issue is about what should be taught, not about what should be read, and it is an important distinction which all too often gets blurred in the heat of the moment.
There is a deep sense of insecurity about our prominent figures.
Let me leave you with this delicious morsel: Book challengers at a North Carolina high school in were apparently willing to overlook the violence depicted in Lord of the Flies, but they did take issue with its negativity.
Leave a Comment If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar. And in practice, the Indian government polices its bans lightly. Democracy's responsibility is to make available a diversity of views, popular and unpopular. Hunting as a family is a bonding experience where time is spent outside together instead of indoors sitting down watching television or playing video games.
The First Amendment guarantees our freedom to decide what we choose to read and think. Negativity Some books are just too sad for any of us to suffer through—at least, according to book challengers. Eagleview Middle School "We don't have to agree with what we read, but we should learn from it. Despite our not-so-casual saunter toward innovative, tech-based learning models, research shows that good, old-fashioned reading is still the best way to improve intelligence.
Libraries should be allowed to provide information presenting contrasting viewpoints on historical issues. Those feelings were very real. Every nation or rather community has its own heroes. Gabrielle Giffords in Tucson, Arizona, inevery public shooting since in the U.
Not only that, but the slurs, sexism, and profanity was fit to the time. I think the root of this issue can be pinned with overprotective parents which are more common than before. In the west, Islam is a minority faith, liable to be overlooked and misinterpreted.
They simply open up their minds, or even offer them something to identify with. Recently, with the increase knowledge in cost and healthcare, the controversy with cigarette smoking has significantly risen. But Indians do not allow scrutiny or scholarly inspection of their heroes. While this has been around it should not be a normal thing.
You might say that in other, more peaceful countries, banning books which incite hatred — racial, gender-based or religious — can be justified on the same grounds. Books for burning photo by Mikael Altemark http: It's not right to coerce the thought of some and inhibit the efforts of others.
Conversely, a person who is mature enough to comprehend what the author is implying will understand the message being emphasized. The freedom to read is of little consequence unless the reader can obtain material to suit his purpose. The Harry Potter books, which have sold million copies, are actually the most banned books in America.WHY BOOKS SHOULD NOT BE BANNED Savannah Kurkowski Dear members of the House of Representatives, BOOKS!
They are amazing things, full of adventures, romance, and discoveries!
Books can bring us to amazing places like Narnia, Germany, and even another person’s mind. Many persuasive written dominicgaudious.net The idea of a books not being allowed to be read is not new and has been around for years. While this has been around it should not be a normal thing.
Helicopter parents are more and more abundant than ever before and it is crippling an already failing school system. Why Books Shouldn’t Be Banned. Banned Books Essay Examples. An Analysis of Banned Books and Censored Literature in the United States.
1, words. 3 pages. An Introduction to the Issue of Banned Books in Our Society. A Personal Opinion on the Reasons Why the Book Go Ask Alice Should Not Be Banned.
1, words. Banned books should be allowed because the books give insight to the culture at the time, because banning brings attention to books that someone did not want Show More Unconstitutional Book Banning Essay.
Laws should not restrict gun rights because first, it would infringe the second amendment, second, guns are a part of our culture, and finally, if guns were outlawed, citizens of the U.
S. would become vulnerable. The most prevalent argument for gun rights is the second amendment to. The idea of a books not being allowed to be read is not new and has been around for years.
While this has been around it should not be a normal thing. Helicopter parents are more and more abundant than ever before and it is crippling an already failing school system.
Why Books Shouldn’t Be Banned.Download